Nersessian and diSessa are two researchers who are interested in
how computational modeling and representations are used. Nersessian’s study
focused on how scientists use models as they build a new hypothesis and create
conclusions. DiSessa focused on how students can learn mathematical and
scientific concepts through computational modeling.
There are several practices that are important to science and
engineering work, mentioned by the NGSS, but that were not particularly
prominent in the Nersessian and diSessa papers. A couple of these practices
include the building of an experiment and collection and usage of data and
observations. Creating an experiment is the first step in a long process for
studying a scientific question, and a researcher needs to decide what data is
relevant or important to answer the question that is asked. Nersessian described
how the researchers in the case study decided on how the experiment should be
set up and what they needed to observe. Computational modeling was used to set up
the experiment.
NGSS discusses analyzing and interpreting data and
observations as an important practice that students should be able to perform.
NGSS argues that that organizing the data into a form (i.e. creating a model or
representation) is a necessary skill. For the Nersessian and diSessa papers,
this is where the practice of computational modeling comes in. It is the focus of
the Nersessian paper, and diSessa discusses how students can use computational
models to create and organize information for themselves to see and make sense
of concepts.
Another practice, discussed in the NGSS, that was prominent in
the readings was revision of hypotheses and the experiment. It was not the
focus of the diSessa paper, but it was a large practice in the Nersessian
paper. For example, the computational modeling the case study in the paper
showed the researchers how an event that they originally thought was something
to minimalize was actually something that was important to their study.
Modeling information observed from data collection can lead to findings that
were not originally predicted, leading to adjustment and revision of the
concepts or hypotheses.
In your final paragraph you say that, “after information or observations are analyzed or tested, revisions are made, and an answer to a question or problem is found, scientists will then use models and representations to explain, and defend, findings or design solutions.” I do not think that models and representations should be used only after questions are answered or even hypothesizes are tested. Models may be included at any part of this process. Models may be used during initial observations. I did not agree that diSessa that computational models act as an explanation for concepts. Modeling is a practice that may be used during any point in this process to comprehend a concept. I did agree with the constant revisions that Nersessian discussed. Being able to discuss and revise models at any point is critical to comprehending a concept. Availability of revision at any point may lead to findings that were not originally predicted, as you said.
ReplyDelete