Nersessian
begins with describing a concept as an active relationship between person and
theory, specifically through attempts to solve a problem and “model-based
reasoning processes.” Then, a scientific experiment is observed and recorded in
which different types of models are used. During the experiment, different
scientists create physical and computational models to represent neurons and
neural pathways. The experiment concludes that the relationship between
creating and revising models leads to the construction of concepts. Concepts
are developed through the specificity of models, both physical and
computational, and allows for learners to construct a mental analogy between
model and concept.
diSessa
begins with describing literacy and how it is used in our lives between
personal, professional and educational uses. Then, it is described how
computers are changing literacy and education. diSessa places literacy into
three categories, or pillars. First, material literacy may range from the use
of paper and pencil to spreadsheets and electronically processed images. Then,
the second type of literacy, mental, is described as a relationship between
physical tools and cognitive thought. diSessa describes a book as a, “poor
stepping stool,” to someone who may not be able to read. The last type is
described as social literacy. The ability to comprehend what others have
written is critical to literacy, as shown by the work of Newton. diSessa then
shows how people build upon another’s ideas through literacy. Finally, literacy
is compared socially to environments and niches.
Both
articles sought to suggest that modeling and literacy both be communicated and
revised. Through communication and revision, modeling and literacy become
active between participants. The researchers in the Nersessian article used
models to make predictions about what would happen next; these models were
communicated and revised in their community. Also, diSessa discusses Galileo’s
theorems and shows how they were communicated and revised between people so now
that learners in high school may understand them. Literacy must be the,
“driving force,” in education as diSessa says. Proper literacy will create
knowledgeable and competent people who may effectively communicate and revise ideas.
A major question we seem to have for diSessa is how should teachers promote this literacy in the classroom. I think for science especially it is difficult to have students who have a lot of prior experience decoding scientific texts, unless they happen to really love science and study it often on their own. I also wonder how parents can help to promote scientific literacy at home. There used to be really great programming on the Discovery Channel and even on the SciFi network; now the Cosmos series is one of the few modern ways for adolescents to get exposure to scientific concepts outside of school.
ReplyDeleteI like how you said that "modeling and literacy become active between participants." We definitely see literacy in this light all the time, but I feel like more often we don't see modeling as requiring another people to accomplish. This might be why I like diSessa's "computational literacy" so much - her conception of modeling (via programming) as a natural extension of our existing literacies is game-changing.
ReplyDelete