I thought diSessa brought up a
really great point about student ownership and engagement. Often, scientific subjects are very textbook
heavy and impersonal. The opportunity to
take control and own your model seems like a great way to encourage motivation
and involvement. Since you cannot change
what a textbook says or alter a figure to adapt for changing factors the text
leaves out, computational modeling
leaves room for creative opportunities to explore subjects in a powerful
way. I was interested in when diSessa
was talking about the boxer course and he said, “I want to emphasize that it
was not uncommon to change a microworld the day before it was used. We were forced into it because we were
developing the course of the fly” (Pg. 52-53).
He then goes on to highlight how computational medium should be viewed
as an adaptable toolkit rather than a turnkey course. I understand that cultures, communities, and
individuals own and personalize many things, but I wonder if he ever felt
unprepared. There is an old quote that I
have heard many times by coaches and friends (Davio), “Failing to prepare is
preparing to fail.” How much of a course
should we as educators have planned and prepared, and how much of a course
should be done “on the fly”?”
One of the benefits of the NetLogo
models is the ability to create and analyze graphs. Specifically, in the TCAP Grade 8 Set 1
science questions, the 7th questions asks students to extrapolate
what happened to the rabbit population between 1987-1988 based on the graph of
rabbit population growth. By changing
potential variables like food, competition, predator population, and or disease
in the NetLogo model, students can look at the differences in graphs and what
each variable does to the population.
This exercise in the predator prey model could have helped students get
this question right on the test. There
seemed to also be many diagrams/graphs/figures/representations in the tests
(EOC Biodiversity and Change, and TCAP).
I think modeling and seeing, revising, discussing, and understanding
different types of models can also help develop these skills in students before
they take these tests. Computational
modeling can definitely be used to help students explore some of the concepts
seen in the tests. (One could create northern and southern blue mussels and
Asian Shore vs. Green crabs, other predator prey models, form and function
models, ecosystems, ect.).
Joey, I think the answer to your question lies somewhere in the middle. In my experience, I think it is important that a teacher always has a plan prepped for the day. The students are counting on us having a game plan and executing it. However, one of the challenges is learning to recognize when a plan isn’t working effectively and adapting it “on the fly”. Every teacher has been in a class where their great lesson plan was a flop and they had to make changes on the spot. diSessa referenced it in Chapter 3 when she realized a student was barely engaged because the thought the activity was boring. I think a plan is always necessary, but then you have to be willing to read the class.
ReplyDelete